Federal judge rules Google violated antitrust law

Google illegally monopolized search and search advertising markets especially by paying $20 billion annually for default search status on iPhones.

Federal judge rules Google violated antitrust law

A federal judge ruled that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search and advertising markets, marking a significant victory for the Department of Justice. This is the first major decision in a wave of tech monopoly cases brought by the U.S. government in recent years, potentially setting a precedent for future rulings against other tech giants. Among other facts established, Google pays Apple $ 20 billion annually for default search status on iPhones.

“Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” Judge Amit Mehta wrote in his decision.

Key details. Here are the main points:

  • Judge Mehta found Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits monopolies.
  • The court focused on Google’s exclusive search deals with Android and Apple devices as key to its anticompetitive behavior.
  • The ruling focuses on Google’s liability, not remedies.
  • Decision comes after a 10-week trial last fall.

Why we care. This is doubtless the beginning of a long story rather than the end of one. It will take some time before the implications for digital advertising are clear.

What’s next. Even before we get to appeals:

  • Remedies to address Google’s monopoly will be determined in future proceedings.
  • Google faces another DOJ trial over its adtech business, starting September 9.

 

The post Federal judge rules Google violated antitrust law appeared first on MarTech.

MarTech

About the author

Anu Adegbola

Staff

(3)